In the early days of the medical examiner profession, the role of forensic pathologist was primarily responsible for declaring people dead. Today, however, the role has evolved significantly. Not only does Dr. Lyons confirm the time of death, but he is also actively engaged with the entire community of law enforcement officials and their associated politics.
The cases of Dr. Arthur Lyons will illustrate the various roles a medical examiner must assume during a single case, whether on the street, in his office, or in the courtroom.
DaysDays
HrsHours
MinsMinutes
SecsSeconds
In the early days of the medical examiner profession, the role of forensic pathologist was primarily responsible for declaring people dead. Today, however, the role has evolved significantly. Not only does Dr. Lyons confirm the time of death, but he is also actively engaged with the entire community of law enforcement officials and their associated politics.
The cases of Dr. Arthur Lyons will illustrate the various roles a medical examiner must assume during a single case, whether on the street, in his office, or in the courtroom.

- Kristin Thorne, Five-time Emmy-award Winning Investigative
The role of a forensic pathologist is multi-faceted. Not only do they perform autopsies, but they also uncover vital forensic evidence regarding how the deceased died. During a death investigation, the medical examiner identifies the cause of death and determines the manner of death—be it suicide, homicide, accident, or natural causes—while sometimes identifying the instrument that caused the death.
That isn’t all by far. Frequently, a forensic pathologist like Dr. Arthur Lyons finds himself in the midst of a legal battle between the defense and prosecution in court
From the onset of his involvement in the case, Dr. Arthur Lyons consistently aimed to base his conclusions on hard scientific data, regardless of the paths chosen by others in the investigation, even when those paths contradicted the undeniable findings of the pathologist.
Follow Dr. Arthur Lyons through some of the most publicized autopsy cases of his time.
Will the pressures from top government legal officials compel him to alter his findings to suit their narrative, despite the truth? Will public sentiment influence his decisions? Will he risk his career to keep his superiors satisfied? Can science in the courtroom prevail against a legal system that prioritizes conviction over justice?
Dr. Arthur Lyons returns with three new investigations inspired by historic real-life cases. While the situations are different, they all have an official story that doesn't survive the scientific analysis gained on the autopsy table.
This continuation of the series begins with a flashback to Dr. Lyon's first encounter with the trappings of legal involvement when he's called to a mass shooting near his home in New Zealand.
In the present, Lyons, alongside his fiercely intelligent and outspoken assistant Larry Hudson, uncovers the evidence others were meant to miss. Disputed wound trajectories, impossible timelines, and concealed forensic findings only scratch the surface.
Between viral arrests and political pressure, Lyons finds himself once again battling the enormous cost of telling the truth.
Rich with scientifically accurate forensic detail and grounded in the realities of modern death investigation, Volume Two blends forensic fiction and historical inspiration into an unflinching examination of medicine, justice, and power.
For fans of true crime, forensic science, and character-driven investigative fiction, Dr. Arthur Lyons, Medical Examiner proves once again that the dead still have stories to tell.
A brief rundown of the titular character's life and experiences leading up to Volume 1
Dr. Arthur Lyons is the central character of a compelling series of novels under the same name written by real-life doctor William R. Anderson. As a forensic pathologist, Dr. Lyons operates in a private pathology setting in Central Florida after previously serving as a medical examiner for the government.
Born in Dunedin on the South Island of New Zealand, Dr. Lyons pursued his education at a university and medical school in Auckland. He later emigrated to the United States to undergo residency training at the prestigious Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University Medical School. Renowned as one of the top training programs in the United States, and arguably the world, they have produced some of the best-trained pathologists in the country.
Dr. Lyons chose to specialize in pathology, which is often considered the basic science of medicine—defined as the ‘study of disease’—because he was more inclined towards the scientific aspects of medicine rather than the ‘art’ of clinical practice. While he appreciated patient interactions and making clinical evaluations, he favored the precise analysis of tissue and laboratory data that form the foundation of pathology, particularly the use of a microscope to diagnose diseases and assess the consequences of injuries.
Upon completing his residency training in pathology, Lyons developed an interest in the intersection of medical information and the legal system. Consequently, he pursued additional training in forensic pathology, spending a year at the Coroner’s office in Los Angeles.
After his training, Dr. Lyons traveled across the country for several years, a common path for new medical examiners, before finally settling in Orlando. There, he became the Deputy Chief Medical Examiner after several years on the staff but eventually ventured into private practice due to disillusionment with the political challenges in the office, which often led to county interference in sensitive cases involving law enforcement-related deaths.
Traditionally, forensic pathology has been practiced within governmental organizations and law enforcement, a situation that often-introduced bias into what should be an objective scientific process. This created significant conflicts between scientific facts and the information that might benefit the prosecution in criminal cases.
The emergence of independent forensic investigators, like Dr. Arthur Lyons, has the potential to disrupt this paradigm.
For many years, medical examiners performed a limited amount of ‘private practice,’ usually conducting autopsies for families or consulting on criminal cases outside their jurisdictions. While this was restrictive in terms of ensuring quality control, it opened a pathway for expansion as more focus was placed on accurate diagnoses, especially in criminal cases where lives could be at stake.
Dr. Lyons recognized the potential conflicts of interest and shortcomings that could arise when a forensic pathologist, employed by a governmental agency, faced situations where their findings could put their employer at legal risk.
A medical examiner who frequently delivered 'adverse opinions' might find themselves in financial jeopardy.
As a private practitioner of forensic pathology, Dr. Arthur Lyons carved out a niche that offered a degree of protection from such external pressures, leading to the development of a highly successful practice in the field.
William R. Anderson MD
Copyright © 2025 W.R. Anderson - All Rights Reserved.
