- COMING This october: Volume 1 of Dr. Arthur Lyons, Medical examiner -

William R. Anderson MD
William R. Anderson MD
  • Home
  • About W.R. Anderson
  • Dr. Arthur Lyons
  • Murdered in a Hoodie
  • Contact Us

“masterfully written work of fiction... Though the cases are fictionalized, the issues they expose are very real...“


- Kristin Thorne, Five-time Emmy-award Winning Investigative

Dr. Arthur Lyons, Medical Examiner: Vol. 1

The role of a forensic pathologist is multi-faceted. Not only do they perform autopsies, but they also uncover vital forensic evidence regarding how the deceased died. During a death investigation, the medical examiner identifies the cause of death and determines the manner of death—be it suicide, homicide, accident, or natural causes—while sometimes identifying the instrument that caused the death.


That isn’t all by far. Frequently, a forensic pathologist like Dr. Arthur Lyons finds himself in the midst of a legal battle between the defense and prosecution in court, as he did in the case of Travis Cooper, the Boy in the Mat.  

From the onset of his involvement in the case, Dr. Arthur Lyons consistently aimed to base his conclusions on hard scientific data, regardless of the paths chosen by others in the investigation, even when those paths contradicted the undeniable findings of the pathologist.


Often facing resistance to accepting scientifically-proven facts, Dr. Lyons was challenged in the case of The Boy in the Gym Mat when he refused to be swayed by differing opinions among the public, investigators, and even the State’s Chief Medical Examiner, as well as the State Prosecutor in the police killing in the Baltimore Rough Ride case, and by the police and press in the questionable handling of the Case of the Phantom Impact.  

Follow Dr. Arthur Lyons through some of the most publicized autopsy cases of his time. 


Will the pressures from top government legal officials compel him to alter his findings to suit their narrative, despite the truth? Will public sentiment influence his decisions? Will he risk his career to keep his superiors satisfied? Can science in the courtroom prevail against a legal system that prioritizes conviction over justice? 

LEARN MORE

Biography of Dr. Arthur Lyons

A brief rundown of the titular character's life and experiences leading up to Volume 1

Dr. Arthur Lyons is the central character of a compelling series of novels under the same name written by real-life doctor William R. Anderson. As a forensic pathologist, Dr. Lyons operates in a private pathology setting in Central Florida after previously serving as a medical examiner for the government.   


Born in Dunedin on the South Island of New Zealand, Dr. Lyons pursued his education at a university and medical school in Auckland. He later emigrated to the United States to undergo residency training at the prestigious Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University Medical School. Renowned as one of the top training programs in the United States, and arguably the world, they have produced some of the best-trained pathologists in the country. 


Dr. Lyons chose to specialize in pathology, which is often considered the basic science of medicine—defined as the ‘study of disease’—because he was more inclined towards the scientific aspects of medicine rather than the ‘art’ of clinical practice. While he appreciated patient interactions and making clinical evaluations, he favored the precise analysis of tissue and laboratory data that form the foundation of pathology, particularly the use of a microscope to diagnose diseases and assess the consequences of injuries. 


Upon completing his residency training in pathology, Lyons developed an interest in the intersection of medical information and the legal system. Consequently, he pursued additional training in forensic pathology, spending a year at the Coroner’s office in Los Angeles.   


After his training, Dr. Lyons traveled across the country for several years, a common path for new medical examiners, before finally settling in Orlando. There, he became the Deputy Chief Medical Examiner after several years on the staff but eventually ventured into private practice due to disillusionment with the political challenges in the office, which often led to county interference in sensitive cases involving law enforcement-related deaths.  


Traditionally, forensic pathology has been practiced within governmental organizations and law enforcement, a situation that often-introduced bias into what should be an objective scientific process. This created significant conflicts between scientific facts and the information that might benefit the prosecution in criminal cases.  


The emergence of independent forensic investigators, like Dr. Arthur Lyons, has the potential to disrupt this paradigm.  


 For many years, medical examiners performed a limited amount of ‘private practice,’ usually conducting autopsies for families or consulting on criminal cases outside their jurisdictions. While this was restrictive in terms of ensuring quality control, it opened a pathway for expansion as more focus was placed on accurate diagnoses, especially in criminal cases where lives could be at stake.  


Dr. Lyons recognized the potential conflicts of interest and shortcomings that could arise when a forensic pathologist, employed by a governmental agency, faced situations where their findings could put their employer at legal risk.


A medical examiner who frequently delivered 'adverse opinions' might find themselves in financial jeopardy. 


As a private practitioner of forensic pathology, Dr. Arthur Lyons carved out a niche that offered a degree of protection from such external pressures, leading to the development of a highly successful practice in the field.


DR. ARTHUR LYONS VOLUME 1 REVIEWS

Volume One Sneak Peak:

THE CASE OF THE DEPUTY INVOLVED SUICIDE 

 “Send help immediately” said the caller on the other end of the phone that was being answered and monitored by the Emergency 911 operator, “my girlfriend just shot herself in the mouth and is bleeding like crazy!”


The voice of the caller sounded high-pitched and staccato as the details were relayed, giving the operator little time to respond but finally, pausing long-enough for her to ask the caller’s location.


“Mam, what is your location?” the operator asked. “Please Miss, we can’t help you if we can’t find you.”


“Lady, quit calling me ‘Miss’ the caller responded, obviously annoyed but speaking a little more slowly, “I’m not a woman; I am a deputy Sheriff with the County and I’m trying to report a shooting—of my girlfriend!” 


DEATH IN THE CANAL: A POLICE EXECUTION

 The police sirens filled the night silence in the small enclave of primarily African American families at the end of a small back street ending at the banks of a large irrigation canal running from Lake Okeechobee to the Atlantic Ocean, thru the northern part of Ft. Pierce, Florida, as more than twenty cars roared down the street in pursuit of a tan-colored sedan, driven by a Black man later identified as Henry Freeman.


Henry had apparently been driving home from his part-time job at a computer store when, according to later police reports, had failed to stop when they tried to pull him over for a damaged taillight on his vehicle. Instead of stopping, he drove to his residence, only a few blocks away, driving at the speed limit at least through the neighborhood, according to several residents who observed the incident from their front porches.


By the time Freeman had driven to the end of the road, at least six police cars had arrived at the scene and within a short time thereafter, the number had swelled to ten patrol squad cars and a Canine unit—all with lights flashing and sirens blasting.


“What the hell’s going on” William Deveraux shouted as he ran to his front porch confronting the sea of blue lights filling up his view of the area of the canal, “who are you chasing?”


“Get your black ass back in the house”: was the response from the burley white deputy approaching the front porch with his hand on the.44 caliber pistol at his side. 


Deveraux immediately retreated to a position on the back of the porch, but still outside, not willing to relinquish his view of the ensuing events—but still not wanting to possibly be shot in the process.


THE CASE OF THE ANGEL OF DEATH

 Dr. Arthur Lyons and his forensic technologist assistant Larry Hudson were in the middle of an autopsy of a fairly young looking sixty-four-year-old gentleman found dead in his hospital bed early in the morning of the day he was supposed to be discharged, and because the family was concerned had requested an autopsy to find out what happened.


Mr. Howard Campbell had been admitted for issues related to his pacemaker that began while vacationing in Central Florida from his home in New York after noticing an unusual sound emanating from the device—although there didn’t seem to be a problem as far as he could tell.


After he presented himself to the Emergency Room at a local hospital, he was initially seen by an ER doctor who ultimately sought a consultation from a Cardiologist to further evaluate the problem. This type of referral is not uncommon in the hospital setting, where most of the physicians are either employed by or have contracts with the hospital, and a hierarchy of referrals has been  established—and while having the potential for enhanced patient  care because of immediate availability of many specialties, also  had the down-side for potential abuse by generating consultations  that are not medically-indicated or completely necessary but do  generate increased income for the institution.


“Doc,” Larry turned to the pathologist, “I got the pacemaker out and all the wires, and they look ok.” 


“Thanks Larry,’ Lyons responded, “great job!”


While the pathologist performed most of the dissection during a  autopsy, there were some areas in which the tech was invaluable, particularly in sawing open the skull to allow examination of the  brain, and tracing such things as pacemaker wires through the  veins to the heart—providing a second set of hands while the  ends of the wires were being examined by the pathologist on the  other end.


“This guy doesn’t look too bad, Doc,” as the heart was removed and place on the scale. “Four Hundred twenty grams. Looks a little big but not anything serious.”


“Larry, I know you’re a genius, but let’s take look inside before you get too excited,” was the reply.

 

THE CASE OF THE HIGH PROFILE 'SUICIDE'

 The jail guard raced down the hall after opening the cell door where accused child sex-trafficker and pornography mogul Ira Morganstern had been incarcerated since his arrest nearly five weeks earlier, shouting almost hysterically to ‘call 911’ and pointing back toward the now opened access point, indicating that there was a medical emergency.


The inmate lay motionless on the floor beside the cot in his rather stark cell, consisting of a sink and toilet, with only a small desk and chair as furnishings, and a tile floor with no carpet. A sheet and blanket were on both the upper and lower cots of the bunkbed, with that of the lower bunk appearing to be in place—a fact that would later be documented in the photos taken by the staff after Mr. Morganstern was removed and taken to the nearest medical center by the responding paramedics. 


While a sheet was later seen hanging down from the top bunk in the photos, amazingly there were apparently no photos showing the top bunk or how—or if—the sheet was actually attached to some part of the bed.


The responders had found the victim without pulse or blood pressure, with the electronic recordings of cardiac activity only showing a pattern that indicated that, while there was still some  minimal electrical activity in the heart, the muscle had been sufficiently compromised by the long period of oxygen deprivation as to make restoration of normal blood pressure, and consequently circulation, impossible.


Nevertheless, according to protocol, emergency transport to the nearest hospital had been affected, with the ambulance arriving about ten minutes after departing the jail. “He’s just been down too long,” the lead paramedic told the Emergency Room doctor, “we couldn’t get any response!”


READ MORE IN Dr. Arthur Lyons, Medical Examiner Volume 1!

  • Home
  • About W.R. Anderson
  • Dr. Arthur Lyons
  • Contact Us

William R. Anderson MD

Copyright © 2025 W.R. Anderson - All Rights Reserved.

Dr. Arthur Lyons Medical Examiner Volume 1

Releases October 7th, 2025, at most major book retailers!

Learn more